Science, Truth, and Democracy. Philip Kitcher. Abstract. What should be the goal of science in a democratic society? Some say, to attain the truth; others deny. Kitcher, Philip, Science, Truth, and Democracy (Oxford Studies in the Philos- Because science policy has been relatively shielded from open democratic. Striving to boldly redirect the philosophy of science, this book by renowned philosopher Philip Kitcher examines the heated debate surrounding the role of.

Author: Daihn Tehn
Country: Malta
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 21 February 2014
Pages: 454
PDF File Size: 12.64 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.36 Mb
ISBN: 251-1-50359-417-3
Downloads: 6713
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Jujind

Kitcher explores the sharp divide between those who believe that the pursuit of scientific knowledge is always valuable and necessary–the purists–and those who believe that it invariably serves the interests of people in positions of power. Kitcher secures naturalism by describing the evolutionary, psychological, and anthropological foundations of the ethical project.

I suspect it also presupposes too much knowledge and vocabulary from classic philosophy of science to be easy reading for scientists, and this will of course also be a problem for general audiences. Sometimes, the only thing keeping a research program alive is dogmatic adherence to a broad scheme of values, without which the cognitive and probative values needed to keep a debate alive would seem absurd. To purchase, visit your preferred ebook provider. Philip Kitcher – – Prometheus Books.

Selgelid – – Science and Engineering Ethics 13 4: Kitcher proposes the following standard of Ideal Endorsement for ethical judgment: Isn’t the scientist’s right to free inquiry absolute?

Reconstructing Reality Margaret Morrison. Throughout, Kitcher remains engaged with reason as he tries to understand, critically, the positions of realists, creationists, empiricists, and constructivists.

Second, Kitcher describes Richard Rudner’s argument that there are often foreseeable consequences of being right or wrong in scientific practice, and we ought, ethically, to weigh those tryth in deciding our standards for acceptance or rejection of hypotheses. Kitcher’s answer to 1 requires deference to scientific experts where appropriate, but also includes the view that when it comes to value-judgments, no one is an expert.


The last stand of value-freedom has been in the context of justification. Second, major scientific controversies involve value-laden disagreements, but their resolution is reasonable because as each side tries to create consistent representations and schemes of values, one side becomes untenable.

The effects of such a conclusion would be malign. Science Logic and Mathematics. I have attempted a systematic survey of all the possibilities for showing that “truth is better than much profit” and have come up empty Science, Policy, demoocracy the Value-Free Ideal.

But failure of that broad scheme of values to meet the standards of ideal endorsement constitute further grounds of criticism. He has a personal story to tell. The same relations hold between cognitive and probative values.

They would simply intensify the state of inferiority. Science and the Common Good: What should be the goal of science demorcacy a democratic society? Philip Kitcher – – Oxford University Press. Yet science could not hope to find the whole truth about that world.

It is certainly an imperfect world. Kitcher defends a quasi-Deweyan account of democracy, according to which democracy is not equivalent to the apparatus of votes and elections. Whether a claim is “true enough” depends on standards having to do with precision and accuracy — how close the results are to the truth, and how likely the procedure is to generate truth. The book tackles “integrating expertise with democratic values,” but does not engage the recent literature on expertise, e.

My library Help Advanced Book Search. Third, Kitcher rightly points out the need for clarification of our talk about “value-judgments” and “schemes of values. It qnd the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Meanwhile the research goes on, unquestioned and unchecked by any moral or social influence beyond the personal sense of responsibility of individual researchers and those who apply their conclusions. The problem is the result of the twin forces of scientismwhich in overreaching undermines the credibility of serious science, and politicization of science by those who feel alienated by science or can profit from eroding science’s authority.


Roland – – Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 2: Controversial, powerful, yet engaging, this volume will appeal to a wide range of readers. Chapter 1 sets up the problem of “the erosion of scientific authority” and gives his account of the role of value-judgments in science.

Science, Truth, and Democracy

Business Ethics The Living War: Tying the objectivity of science to freedom from values is based on the mistaken idea that value-judgments are arbitrary and subjective, the idea that value-judgment is not really a form of kkitcher, but merely an expression of preferences.

Inductive risk and values in science. The first chapter also includes an argument that science cannot and should not try to be value-free.

Certification of a scientific claim as public knowledge requires that the relevant community of inquirers determine that the claim is true enough and significant enough. Where Science, Truth, and Democracy focused on the aims of science, Science in a Democratic Society considers the acceptance of scientific claims, their application and dissemination, and the role of diversity and dissent within science as well as public dissent about science.

Part I The Search for Truth.

Science, Truth, and Democracy – Oxford Scholarship

Yet kitccher should that judgement be made? It concludes with a chapter on the responsibilities of scientists. Finally, I found the Index frustratingly incomplete. Genuine Problems and the Significance of Science. Science in a Democratic Society. What we need to resolve this problem is a theory of science’s place in a democratic society, which for Kitcher has two parts:

Leave a Reply